Free version will do some decent work, and if you pay you’ll get a little more WP also exports / saves files as MP3 / AAC formats without having to pay extra.ĭisclaimer: I’ve been a Pro Tools audio engineer for about 14 years – first session was on an Audio Media III card in a big old beige Apple Mac when it took about 5 minutes to load a session! Now that computers are fast enough for software to run native, however, users can get a lot of work done (high track and plug-in count) without needing the expansion cards to help with the processing. Audacity’s noise reduction isn’t the best on the block, but its easy and does a decent enough job considering it doesn’t cost anything.Īnother side note: If noise reduction is your goal, you can also look into WavePad. Ardour comparison, there is one thing to note that I found a result of just finishing up a post production project I had to do on the fly – there is a place where Audacity seems to be better insofar as workflow and use than Ardour: noise reduction. it’s not as intuitive to use as Pro Tools), but if you’re looking to do some multitrack audio recording with a lot of mixing options without having buying professional audio production software, then Ardour is a better and more flexible option than Audacity.īefore getting to the direct Audacity vs. Ardour’s complete list of features, audio formats, plugins, window layouts, and mix automation options all make Ardour a much more powerful recording and mixing tool.Īrdour takes longer to learn how to use than Audacity. To save the suspense: Ardour comes out on top. Jump to: Review of free recording software: Audacity and Ardour.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |